• About
  • Partner
  • Bespoke Research
  • Contact
Sunday, March 7, 2021
No Result
View All Result
Times Of Entrepreneurship
  • Women Entrepreneurs
  • Rest of US
  • Global
  • Finance
  • Mentorship
  • Deep Tech
  • Women Entrepreneurs
  • Rest of US
  • Global
  • Finance
  • Mentorship
  • Deep Tech
Times Of Entrepreneurship
No Result
View All Result

Venture Capital Returns Are More Skewed Than People Realize

by Seth Levine
October 7, 2020
in Finance, Mentorship
Reading Time: 3min read
0
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

This post originally appeared on Seth’s blog.

Some of the most popular posts I’ve written over the past couple of years were the two that focused on just how rare outsized returns for an individual deal are in venture capital. You can see the original posts here and here. In those posts I was analyzing data from Correlation Ventures that showed just how skewed venture returns are, specifically that 65% of investment rounds fail to return 1x capital and only 4% return greater than 10x capital.

Ian Hathaway, who recently co-authored the second edition of Startup Communities with my partner, Brad, sent me the chart below, which highlights how that translates to returns in venture capital as an asset class. I’ve seen versions of this chart before, and while it’s not surprising it is always jarring to see it laid out like this. Specifically, the difference between the best performing and average performing firms are incredibly wide. Venture is a hits business and if you think about a typical venture fund of almost any size having somewhere between 25 – 40 investments, the chances of any one of those investments being a true outlier and returning a multiple of the fund are quite small. In order to have a successful fund, it’s almost a requirement that you have an outlier return for at least one of your investments (see below the chart for the math).

Dispersion of Returns for Active Managers in Various Asset Classes

Some quick math highlights why this is the case. For example, assume a $100M fund with 30 investments. That’s a little over $3M per investment, and while there is some dispersion from the average across companies in a fund, it’s not a bad way to model it. But from the outcomes chart above (the first one) we know that on average only 1 (actually just fewer than 1) company in that group of 30 will return between 10x and 20x. And less than 1 will return 20x or greater (I’m using the company averages, the dollar averages are on a per round basis, which would make these numbers even worse). A 20x returner for a fund that on average invests $3-$3.5M in a company doesn’t return that fund. Taking the most aggressive end of these numbers would still only have this one company returning 70% of the fund’s capital. If you were going to have several of these, of course, that would work out for your fund. IRR will depend on the timing of cash flows but as a quick rule of thumb, venture funds look to return at least 3 times the invested capital – after fees, so more like 3.5x on a gross basis. That’s pretty hard to do without a true outlier return (50x+) and/or consistency of 10x+ returns that is simply hard to generate. And here’s where the dispersion comes in. The best funds do have multiple companies that return in that range. Or higher. But that means the median fund doesn’t have any. And that is why the average venture fund isn’t actually a particularly good investment and also why so many venture funds fail to return capital.

I thought about this a couple of years ago when I wrote about the optimal venture fund strategy and my conclusion was that venture firms should place more bets and have more exposure across a larger set of businesses. Obviously, those inside the industry argue that managers who are good at picking businesses would do better to own more of fewer businesses if they can show that they have the aptitude to invest in those that become true outliers. But given how rare they are, I wonder if that is arguably the optimal strategy. As David Cohen replied once years ago when I asked him what the key to being a successful venture capitalist was: “Luck”.

For more inspiring stories, insights and actionable funding opportunities, subscribe to Times of E’s weekly newsletter, www.timesofe.com/introduction.
Tags: early stage investingSeth LevineVenture capitalventure capital as an asset class
Seth Levine

Seth Levine

Hi, I'm Seth Levine, a Boulder, CO based technology investor and managing director at Foundry Group. While I love technology I’m also a husband, father, avid cyclist, snowboarder and outdoors guy.

Related Posts

photo of an open sign

The Small End Of The Economy Has Been Struggling For Decades. 2021 May Be The Year Everything Changes.

by Elizabeth Macbride
March 3, 2021
0

In 2021, the nearly 60 million Americans who are entrepreneurial in some way might have an easier time starting and...

About Times of E: The Evolution Of Business Journalism

About Times of E: The Evolution Of Business Journalism

by Elizabeth Macbride
March 3, 2021
0

In January 2021, Times of E founder Elizabeth MacBride interviewed our first full-time reporter, Skyler Rossi. They talked about the...

Op-Ed: The Business Lobby Is Up For Grabs

Op-Ed: The Business Lobby Is Up For Grabs

by Elizabeth MacBride
February 18, 2021
0

When the National Association of Manufacturers moved rapidly to condemn the events of Jan. 6, I noticed. The Association, like...

smiling bearded man in an open-collared shirt

Hopes And Fears For Entrepreneurs Under Biden Administration

by Skyler Rossi
February 4, 2021
0

Felice Gorordo: The Administration is looking to build a new economy, one that is fairer toward people who have been...

Weekly newsletter: More Wins For Democrats, 2020’S Biggest Funding Rounds, Miami Manifesto, PPP Access

Supply Change Capital Focuses On A Tipping Point: 2045

by Ellen Chang
January 12, 2021
0

Noramay Cadena Supply Change CapitalChicago and Los Angeles What it is: Founded in August 2020, Supply Change Capital is a pre-seed and seed...

Venture Capital And America’s Slowing Innovation Engine

Venture Capital And America’s Slowing Innovation Engine

by Elizabeth Macbride
January 1, 2021
0

The question is: Who gets funded, and why? Nikki King, above, had an idea that didn't fit the mold. This...

Subscribe to Times of E’s Free Weekly Newsletter

Be part of the story. It’s a changing, socially conscious, entrepreneurial world.

Popular

  • Top 20 U.S. University Entrepreneurship Competitions

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • How A Savvy Pittsburgh Salesman Grew A Small Manufacturing Empire With Lori Greiner’s Help

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Op-Ed: The Real Reason Women Entrepreneurs Struggle to Raise Funding

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The Hub: A PR Coup For TikTok, $350K Of CleanTech Funding, And A DoorDash Accelerator

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • The Small End Of The Economy Has Been Struggling For Decades. 2021 May Be The Year Everything Changes.

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Recent

Op-Ed: The Business Lobby Is Up For Grabs

Editor’s Note: Why A Worker Is No Longer A Worker

March 5, 2021
man holding a screen

Weekly Newsletter: The Right To Be Entrepreneurial, Shark Tanking It, And Chopsticks 2.0

March 4, 2021
photo of an open sign

The Small End Of The Economy Has Been Struggling For Decades. 2021 May Be The Year Everything Changes.

March 3, 2021

Recommended

  • Health
  • Climate
  • Deep Tech
  • Finance
  • Education
  • Women Entrepreneurs
  • Mentorship
A Pakistani Entrepreneur’s Insight Led To An Untapped Market Of 780 Million

A Pakistani Entrepreneur’s Insight Led To An Untapped Market Of 780 Million

2 years ago
How To Get a Job In Venture Capital

How To Get a Job In Venture Capital

2 years ago
  • About
  • Partner
  • Bespoke Research
  • Contact

© 2020 Mondial Publishing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

 
Facebook
Twitter
Linkedin
No Result
View All Result
  • Women Entrepreneurs
  • Rest of US
  • Global
  • Finance
  • Mentorship
  • Deep Tech

© 2020 Mondial Publishing Inc. All Rights Reserved.